Do We Really Need Gold Samples for Sample Weighting Under Label Noise?
Results and benchmarks
Do We Really Need Gold Samples for Sample Weighting Under Label Noise? is the primary contribution described in this paper.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classification | CIFAR-10 | Accuracy | 100 | paper-derived |
| Classification | clean test set of CIFAR-10/CIFAR-100 | Accuracy | 28 | paper-derived |
| Sample Weighting Under Label Noise | CIFAR-10 | Accuracy | 0 | paper-derived |
| Sample Weighting Under Label Noise | CIFAR-100 | AUC | 40 | paper-derived |
| Sample Weighting Under Label Noise | 40% | CIFAR-10 | 60 | paper-derived |
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.
Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.
Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 95/100, status high.
Implementation
Best maintained implementation now
A curated list of resources for Learning with Noisy Labels
2,717 stars · 354 forks · Last push May 3, 2025
- License
- CI
- Dependencies
- Docker
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
subeeshvasu/Awesome-Learning-with-Label-Noise is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals.
Open subeeshvasu/Awesome-Learning-with-Label-Noise- License metadata missing
- No CI workflows detected
- Dependency manifest is missing
- Selected subeeshvasu/Awesome-Learning-with-Label-Noise as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
- Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
- Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 2,717
- Last push
- May 3, 2025 (479d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 7
- Last push
- Feb 10, 2021 (2023d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
Reproduction readiness
Major work
No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required
- subeeshvasu/Awesome-Learning-with-Label-Noise has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
- You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
- Last push was 479 days ago.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Hugging Face artifacts
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Models
- waifu-research-department/long-prompt-weighting-pipeline
0 downloads · 18 likes
Broaden model search
Datasets
No trustworthy datasets matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceSpaces
No trustworthy spaces matches right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceResearch context
Tasks
Classification, Sample Weighting Under Label Noise
Methods
None detected
Domains
None detected
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).