Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Dion3: Full-Stack Orthogonal Updates

Noah Amsel, Jack Zhang, Kwangjun Ahn, Ali Naeimi, Austin Feng +3 morePublished Aug 12, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: Niche / domain-specific · No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.

The Muon optimizer incurs a significant overhead cost due to its cubic-time Newton-Schulz orthogonalization step. When weights are sharded, communication overhead compounds this computational cost, eroding the benefits of Muon in many settings. We present Dion3, a revision of Muon that targets this overhead at every level of the stack. Our Gram Newton-Schulz algorithm reduces the FLOP cost of orthogonalization, our CuteDSL kernels accelerate it by exploiting symmetry, and our megabatching strategy reduces communication overhead. Moreover, we propose a simple change to the update rule that cuts costs even further: selecting only a fraction of the momentum matrix's rows to orthogonalize at each step. This update rule improves on Dion (another "compressed" version of Muon), in both speed and performance. Overall, Dion3 matches or improves on the loss achieved by Muon but reduces optimizer step time by up to 6x. Dion3 is available via the dion package (https://github.com/microsoft/dion) as a drop-in replacement for Muon.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: warm
The Muon optimizer incurs a significant overhead cost due to its cubic-time Newton-Schulz orthogonalization step.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

This is primarily a method paper. Reproduce it within a maintained framework baseline instead of chasing paper-specific repos.

Reproduction risks
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation is currently available

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

microsoft/dion
alternative
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
558
Last push
Sep 30, 2026 (29d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (558 stars)

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Strong
Stars
0
Last push
Oct 24, 2026 (5d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match
yiran529/muon
alternative
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
1
Last push
Sep 18, 2026 (42d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Oct 30, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Framework baselines

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX