Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Computer vision
COCO
AP
50
Split: test
Source: paper fulltext
Computer vision
ATSS
Recall.
95.9
Source: paper fulltext
Computer vision
Cascade R-CNN
Recall.
89.2
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

3 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Computer vision COCO AP 50 paper-derived No explicit refs
Computer vision ATSS Recall. 95.9 paper-derived No explicit refs
Computer vision Cascade R-CNN Recall. 89.2 paper-derived No explicit refs

Dense Distinct Query for End-to-End Object Detection is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (jshilong/ddq).

Open jshilong/ddq

Reproduction Risks

  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

jshilong/ddq
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
266
Last push
May 24, 2023 (1121d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
20
Last push
Nov 25, 2025 (205d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

Stars
10
Last push
Jun 3, 2023 (1111d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

jshilong/ddq
Historical official
Stars: 266
Last push: May 24, 2023
  • Only historical official repository was found: jshilong/ddq.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 18, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · jshilong/ddq has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 1121 days ago.
Open jshilong/ddq

Framework baselines

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

Computer vision

Methods

None detected

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.