DELULU: Discriminative Embedding Learning Using Latent Units for Speaker-Aware Self-Trained Speech Foundational Model
Massa Baali, Rita Singh, Bhiksha Raj
No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
Self-supervised speech models have achieved remarkable success on content-driven tasks, yet they remain limited in capturing speaker-discriminative features critical for verification, diarization, and profiling applications. We introduce \textsc{DELULU}, a speaker-aware self-trained foundational model that addresses this limitation by incorporating speaker-informed structure into pseudo-label generation. DELULU lever ...
ages frame-level embeddings from ReDimNet, a state-of-the-art speaker verification model, to guide k-means clustering during pre-training, introducing a speaker-discriminative inductive bias that aligns representation learning with speaker identity. DELULU significantly outperforms prior SSL models across a range of speaker-centric tasks, achieving up to \textbf{62\% relative improvement} in equal error rate (EER) for speaker verification and consistent gains on zero-shot profiling tasks including gender, age, accent, and speaker counting; notably surpassing even its teacher model on zero-shot evaluations. Our findings demonstrate that \textbf{DELULU is a strong universal encoder for speaker-aware speech processing}, enabling superior performance without task-specific fine-tuning.
Results & Benchmarks
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Self-supervised speech models have achieved remarkable success on content-driven tasks, yet they remain limited in capturing speaker-discriminative features critical for verification, diarization, and profiling applications.
Implementation Evidence Summary
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXNeed human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.