Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Perceptual Forgery Fidelity Assessment Deepfake Detection
Ser-fiq
AUC.
92.33
Source: paper fulltext
Perceptual Forgery Fidelity Assessment Deepfake Detection
BRISQUE
AUC.
91.90
Source: paper fulltext
Perceptual Forgery Fidelity Assessment Deepfake Detection
NIQE
AUC.
92.91
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

3 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Perceptual Forgery Fidelity Assessment Deepfake Detection Ser-fiq AUC. 92.33 paper-derived No explicit refs
Perceptual Forgery Fidelity Assessment Deepfake Detection BRISQUE AUC. 91.90 paper-derived No explicit refs
Perceptual Forgery Fidelity Assessment Deepfake Detection NIQE AUC. 92.91 paper-derived No explicit refs

DeepFidelity: Perceptual Forgery Fidelity Assessment for Deepfake Detection is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

FaceOnLive/DeepFake-Detection-SDK-Linux is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Strong overlap with paper title keywords). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 59 GitHub stars.

Open shimmer-ghq/deepfidelity

Reproduction Risks

  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

shimmer-ghq/deepfidelity
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
11
Last push
Jun 2, 2024 (748d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
shimmer-ghq/DeepFidelity
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

Stars
11
Last push
Jun 2, 2024 (748d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

shimmer-ghq/deepfidelity
Historical official
Stars: 11
Last push: Jun 2, 2024
  • Only historical official repository was found: shimmer-ghq/deepfidelity.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 18, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · shimmer-ghq/deepfidelity has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • · Last push was 748 days ago — expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • · No Dockerfile — you will set up the environment manually.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open shimmer-ghq/deepfidelity

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/shimmer-ghq/deepfidelity.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Tasks

Perceptual Forgery Fidelity Assessment Deepfake Detection

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Perceptual Forgery Fidelity Assessment Deepfake Detection

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote