Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

Deep Learning with Topological Signatures is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

c-hofer/nips2017 is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Official implementation from Papers with Code). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 37 GitHub stars.

Open c-hofer/persistent_homology_toolbox

Reproduction Risks

  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
26
Last push
Mar 5, 2020 (2298d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
c-hofer/nips2017
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
37
Last push
Mar 6, 2020 (2297d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

c-hofer/persistent_homology_toolbox
Historical official
Stars: 26
Last push: Mar 5, 2020
  • Only historical official repository was found: c-hofer/persistent_homology_toolbox.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 20, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · c-hofer/persistent_homology_toolbox has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 2298 days ago.
Open c-hofer/persistent_homology_toolbox

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

  • c-hofer/nips2017
    Adjacent
    Confidence: Low
    Stars: 37

    Official implementation from Papers with Code

Additional implementations

Official

  • c-hofer/nips2017
    Confidence: High

    Deprecated repository for "Deep Learning with Topological Signatures"

    Stars: 37
    Forks: 14
    Last push: Mar 6, 2020

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.