Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
tf

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Representation learning
Part : Baselines
F1.
0.778
Source: paper fulltext
Representation learning
TF-IDF+Balanced SVM
Recall
0.816
Source: paper fulltext
Representation learning
TF-IDF+GBDT
F1.
0.813
Source: paper fulltext
Hate Speech Detection Tweets
Part : Baselines
F1.
0.778
Source: paper fulltext
Hate Speech Detection Tweets
TF-IDF+Balanced SVM
Recall
0.816
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

6 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Representation learning Part : Baselines F1. 0.778 paper-derived No explicit refs
Representation learning TF-IDF+Balanced SVM Recall 0.816 paper-derived No explicit refs
Representation learning TF-IDF+GBDT F1. 0.813 paper-derived No explicit refs
Hate Speech Detection Tweets Part : Baselines F1. 0.778 paper-derived No explicit refs
Hate Speech Detection Tweets TF-IDF+Balanced SVM Recall 0.816 paper-derived No explicit refs
Hate Speech Detection Tweets TF-IDF+GBDT F1. 0.813 paper-derived No explicit refs

Deep Learning for Hate Speech Detection in Tweets is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (pinkeshbadjatiya/twitter-hatespeech).

Open pinkeshbadjatiya/twitter-hatespeech

Reproduction Risks

  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 1 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
220
Last push
Dec 8, 2017 (3116d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

pinkeshbadjatiya/twitter-hatespeech
Historical official
Stars: 220
Last push: Dec 8, 2017
  • Only historical official repository was found: pinkeshbadjatiya/twitter-hatespeech.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 20, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · pinkeshbadjatiya/twitter-hatespeech has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 3116 days ago.
Open pinkeshbadjatiya/twitter-hatespeech

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Representation learning, Hate Speech Detection Tweets

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.