Datasets and Benchmarks for Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
This paper presents a comprehensive benchmarking suite tailored to offline safe reinforcement learning (RL) challenges, aiming to foster progress in the development and evaluation of safe learning algorithms in both the training and deployment phases. Our benchmark suite contains three packages: 1) expertly crafted safe policies, 2) D4RL-styled datasets along with environment wrappers, and 3) high-quality offline safe RL baseline implementations. We feature a methodical data collection pipeline powered by advanced safe RL algorithms, which facilitates the generation of diverse datasets across 38 popular safe RL tasks, from robot control to autonomous driving. We further introduce an array of data post-processing filters, capable of modifying each dataset's diversity, thereby simulating various data collection conditions. Additionally, we provide elegant and extensible implementations of prevalent offline safe RL algorithms to accelerate research in this area. Through extensive experiments with over 50000 CPU and 800 GPU hours of computations, we evaluate and compare the performance of these baseline algorithms on the collected datasets, offering insights into their strengths, limitations, and potential areas of improvement. Our benchmarking framework serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners, facilitating the development of more robust and reliable offline safe RL solutions in safety-critical applications. The benchmark website is available at \url{www.offline-saferl.org}.
Results and benchmarks
This paper presents a comprehensive benchmarking suite tailored to offline safe reinforcement learning (RL) challenges, aiming to foster progress in the development and evaluation of safe learning algorithms in both the training and deployment phases.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 70/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation was found; start with the closest related repositories below.
- Compare repo methods against the paper equations/algorithm before trusting metrics.
- Create a minimal baseline implementation from the paper and use adjacent repos as references.
Time to first repro: a few days
polixir/NeoRL is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matches contextual method/domain keyword: reinforcement learning). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 137 GitHub stars.
- Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
- Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
- Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Through extensive experiments with over 50000 CPU and 800 GPU hours of computations, we evaluate and compare the performance of these baseline algorithms on the collected datasets,
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
Closest related implementations
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
- polixir/NeoRL Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 137 stars
Matches contextual method/domain keyword: reinforcement learning
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
6
Citations
0
References
Tasks
Benchmarking, Computer science, Benchmark (surveying), Suite, Implementation, Pipeline (software), Baseline (sea), Offline learning
Methods
Reinforcement learning
Domains
Machine learning, Artificial intelligence
Related papers
- COMPARISON OF BEST PRACTICE BENCHMARKING MODELSSearch on Paper2Code
2011 · Semantic similarity
- Strategic Benchmarking: How to Rate Your Company's Performance against the World's BestSearch on Paper2Code
1993 · Semantic similarity
- Theoretical Aspects of Benchmarking TheorySearch on Paper2Code
2004 · Semantic similarity
- A guide for mental health clinicians to develop and undertake benchmarking activitiesSearch on Paper2Code
2010 · Semantic similarity
- Comparing ourselves: using benchmarking techniques to measure performance between academic librariesSearch on Paper2Code
2009 · Semantic similarity
- Benchmarking: Roadmap to best practicesSearch on Paper2Code
2006 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.