Data Splits and Metrics for Method Benchmarking on Surgical Action Triplet Datasets
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
In addition to generating data and annotations, devising sensible data splitting strategies and evaluation metrics is essential for the creation of a benchmark dataset. This practice ensures consensus on the usage of the data, homogeneous assessment, and uniform comparison of research methods on the dataset. This study focuses on CholecT50, which is a 50 video surgical dataset that formalizes surgical activities as triplets of . In this paper, we introduce the standard splits for the CholecT50 and CholecT45 datasets and show how they compare with existing use of the dataset. CholecT45 is the first public release of 45 videos of CholecT50 dataset. We also develop a metrics library, ivtmetrics, for model evaluation on surgical triplets. Furthermore, we conduct a benchmark study by reproducing baseline methods in the most predominantly used deep learning frameworks (PyTorch and TensorFlow) to evaluate them using the proposed data splits and metrics and release them publicly to support future research. The proposed data splits and evaluation metrics will enable global tracking of research progress on the dataset and facilitate optimal model selection for further deployment.
Results and benchmarks
In addition to generating data and annotations, devising sensible data splitting strategies and evaluation metrics is essential for the creation of a benchmark dataset.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 70/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation was found; start with the closest related repositories below.
- Compare repo methods against the paper equations/algorithm before trusting metrics.
- Create a minimal baseline implementation from the paper and use adjacent repos as references.
Time to first repro: a few days
Aastha2104/Parkinson-Disease-Prediction is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matches contextual method/domain keyword: computer science). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 194 GitHub stars.
- Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
- Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
- Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
Closest related implementations
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
- Aastha2104/Parkinson-Disease-Prediction Adjacent · Confidence: Low · 194 stars
Matches contextual method/domain keyword: computer science
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Datasets
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
12
Citations
19
References
Tasks
Benchmark (surveying), Benchmarking, Computer science, Baseline (sea), Data mining, Software deployment, Homogeneous, Medicine
Methods
Selection (genetic algorithm)
Domains
Machine learning, Artificial intelligence
Related papers
- COMPARISON OF BEST PRACTICE BENCHMARKING MODELSSearch on Paper2Code
2011 · Semantic similarity
- Strategic Benchmarking: How to Rate Your Company's Performance against the World's BestSearch on Paper2Code
1993 · Semantic similarity
- Theoretical Aspects of Benchmarking TheorySearch on Paper2Code
2004 · Semantic similarity
- A guide for mental health clinicians to develop and undertake benchmarking activitiesSearch on Paper2Code
2010 · Semantic similarity
- Comparing ourselves: using benchmarking techniques to measure performance between academic librariesSearch on Paper2Code
2009 · Semantic similarity
- Benchmarking: Roadmap to best practicesSearch on Paper2Code
2006 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.