Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Cross-Lingual Sentiment Quantification

Andrea Esuli, Alejandro Moreo, Fabrizio SebastianiPublished May 1, 2020
DOI Publisher
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Sentiment Quantification is the task of estimating the relative frequency of sentiment-related classes—such as ${\sf Positive}$Positive and ${\sf Negative}$Negative—in a set of unlabeled documents. It is an important topic in sentiment analysis, as the study of sentiment-related quantities and trends across a population is often of higher interest than the analysis of individual instances. In this article, we propose a method for cross-lingual sentiment quantification, the task of performing sentiment quantification when training documents are available for a source language $\mathcal {S}$S, but not for the target language $\mathcal {T}$T, for which sentiment quantification needs to be performed. Cross-lingual sentiment quantification (and cross-lingual text quantification in general) has never been discussed before in the literature; we establish baseline results for the binary case by combining state-of-the-art quantification methods with methods capable of generating cross-lingual vectorial representations of the source and target documents involved. Experiments on publicly available datasets for cross-lingual sentiment classification show that the presented method performs cross-lingual sentiment quantification with high accuracy.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Sentiment Quantification is the task of estimating the relative frequency of sentiment-related classes—such as ${\sf Positive}$Positive and ${\sf Negative}$Negative—in a set of unlabeled documents.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

37

Citations

28

References

Tasks

Sentiment analysis, Computer science, Task (project management), Binary classification, Binary number, Set (abstract data type), Population

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Natural language processing, Artificial intelligence

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers