Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few hours
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

Cousins Of The Vendi Score: A Family Of Similarity-Based Diversity Metrics For Science And Machine Learning is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

vertaix/vendi-score is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open vertaix/vendi-score

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

vertaix/vendi-score
best maintained
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
159
Last push
Jul 27, 2025 (311d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
vertaix/vendi-sampling
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
13
Last push
Jan 13, 2025 (506d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
6
Last push
Jan 19, 2025 (500d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

vertaix/vendi-score
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

vertaix/Vendi-Score

Stars: 159
Forks: 13
Last push: Jul 27, 2025
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Community adoption signal (159 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected vertaix/vendi-score as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Historical official implementation

Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.

vertaix/vendi-sampling
Stars: 13
Last push: Jan 13, 2025

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 2, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · vertaix/vendi-score has pyproject.toml but requires manual environment setup.
  • · Last push was 311 days ago — expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • · No Dockerfile — you will set up the environment manually.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open vertaix/vendi-score

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/vertaix/vendi-score.git
pip install -e .

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.