Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated Learning

Published Dec 1, 2018
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated Learning is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Privacy Meter: An open-source library to audit data privacy in statistical and machine learning algorithms.

723 stars · 153 forks · Last push Apr 26, 2025 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Partial overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (723 stars)

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Selected privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
723
Last push
Apr 26, 2025 (486d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
jefffffffu/dpsur
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
27
Last push
Jan 25, 2025 (576d)

Community adoption signal (27 stars)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
May 25, 2022 (1552d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 23, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 486 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/privacytrustlab/ml_privacy_meter.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Passive Active White-box Inference Attacks Against

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).