Results and benchmarks
Competitive Gradient Descent presents a stochastic optimization method.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 35/100, grounding 58/100, status low.
Implementation
Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)
Only a historical official implementation is available
Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.
f-t-s/CGD · 25 stars · Last push Dec 18, 2019
This is primarily a method paper. Reproduce it within a maintained framework baseline instead of chasing paper-specific repos.
Open f-t-s/CGD- No maintained paper-verified implementation is currently available
- No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
- Only historical official repository was found: f-t-s/CGD.
- No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 25
- Last push
- Dec 18, 2019 (2443d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 20
- Last push
- Aug 11, 2022 (1475d)
Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 116
- Last push
- Jan 14, 2022 (1685d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
Reproduction readiness
Major work
No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required
- f-t-s/CGD has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
- You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
- Last push was 2443 days ago.
Validation caveat
Framework baselines
- PyTorch Adam optimizer docs
Reference implementation of Adam in PyTorch.
- Optax Adam optimizer docs
JAX/Flax baseline for Adam variants.
- Keras Adam optimizer docs
TensorFlow/Keras baseline for Adam.
Repositories and ecosystem
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- devzhk/cgds-package
Confidence: Low · 20 stars
- devzhk/Implicit-Competitive-Regularization
Confidence: Low · 116 stars
- gehring/fax
Confidence: Low · 80 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
None detected
Methods
Stochastic optimization
Domains
None detected
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).