Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Common Bugs in Scratch Programs

Published Dec 1, 2021
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Common Bugs in Scratch Programs is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate
se2p/LitterBox

Static code analysis tool for detecting recurring patterns in Scratch projects.

36 stars · 6 forks · Last push Mar 7, 2026 · GPL-3.0 license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

se2p/LitterBox is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (GPL-3.0).

Open se2p/LitterBox
Reproduction risks
  • Dependency manifest is missing
  • Selected se2p/LitterBox as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

se2p/LitterBox
best maintained
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
36
Last push
Mar 7, 2026 (171d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • Dependency manifest missing
se2p/artifact-iticse2020
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
Apr 26, 2021 (1947d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 25, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • se2p/LitterBox has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Open se2p/LitterBox

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Curated Related

Broaden model search

common bugs scratch programs

Datasets

No trustworthy datasets matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).