Daniel Song, Peter Ney, Cristina Menghini, Faizan Ahmad, Aidan Boyd, Nathaniel Li, Ziwen Han, Jean-Christophe Testud, Saisuke Okabayashi, Maeve Ryan, Jinpeng Miao, Hamza Kwisaba, Felix Binder, Spencer Whitman, Jim Gust, Esteban Arcaute, Dhaval Kapil, Jacob Kahn, Ayaz Minhas, Tristan Goodman, Lauren Deason, Alexander Vaughan, Shengjia Zhao, Summer Yue
No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
This report documents the preparedness assessment of Code World Model (CWM), a model for code generation and reasoning about code from Meta. We conducted pre-release testing across domains identified in our Frontier AI Framework as potentially presenting catastrophic risks, and also evaluated the model's misaligned propensities. Our assessment found that CWM does not pose additional frontier risks beyond those presen ...
t in the current AI ecosystem. We therefore release it as an open-weight model.
Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.
This report documents the preparedness assessment of Code World Model (CWM), a model for code generation and reasoning about code from Meta.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXNeed human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.