CHIRP dataset: towards long-term, individual-level, behavioral monitoring of bird populations in the wild
Alex Hoi Hang Chan, Neha Singhal, Onur Kocahan, Andrea Meltzer, Saverio Lubrano, Miyako H. Warrington, Michel Griesser, Fumihiro Kano, Hemal Naik
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Long-term behavioral monitoring of individual animals is crucial for studying behavioral changes that occur over different time scales, especially for conservation and evolutionary biology. Computer vision methods have proven to benefit biodiversity monitoring, but automated behavior monitoring in wild populations remains challenging. This stems from the lack of datasets that cover a range of computer vision tasks ne ...
cessary to extract biologically meaningful measurements of individual animals. Here, we introduce such a dataset (CHIRP) with a new method (CORVID) for individual re-identification of wild birds. The CHIRP (Combining beHaviour, Individual Re-identification and Postures) dataset is curated from a long-term population of wild Siberian jays studied in Swedish Lapland, supporting re-identification (re-id), action recognition, 2D keypoint estimation, object detection, and instance segmentation. In addition to traditional task-specific benchmarking, we introduce application-specific benchmarking with biologically relevant metrics (feeding rates, co-occurrence rates) to evaluate the performance of models in real-world use cases. Finally, we present CORVID (COlouR-based Video re-ID), a novel pipeline for individual identification of birds based on the segmentation and classification of colored leg rings, a widespread approach for visual identification of individual birds. CORVID offers a probability-based id tracking method by matching the detected combination of color rings with a database. We use application-specific benchmarking to show that CORVID outperforms state-of-the-art re-id methods. We hope this work offers the community a blueprint for curating real-world datasets from ethically approved biological studies to bridge the gap between computer vision research and biological applications.
Results & Benchmarks
Benchmark evidence drill-down
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer vision | SlowFast | Recall | 0.678 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Computer vision | C3D | Recall | 0.715 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Computer vision | X3D | Recall | 0.678 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
Long-term behavioral monitoring of individual animals is crucial for studying behavioral changes that occur over different time scales, especially for conservation and evolutionary biology.
Implementation Evidence Summary
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
LLM evidence refs: paper.abstract, evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_16], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_7], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_14], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_20], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_9], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_10], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_table_1], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_6], evidencePack.paperSections[id=paper_caption_5], researcherSummary.benchmarkSnapshot[0], researcherSummary.benchmarkSnapshot[1], researcherSummary.benchmarkSnapshot[2], guidance.riskFlags[0], guidance.riskFlags[1], researcherSummary.reproductionRisks[0]
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- ยท No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Framework baselines
- TorchVision object detection finetuning tutorial
Baseline setup for object detection workflows.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
Tasks
Computer vision
Methods
None detected
Domains
Computer vision
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.