Characterizing Linear Alignment Across Language Models
Matt Gorbett, Suman Jana
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Language models increasingly appear to learn similar representations, despite differences in training objectives, architectures, and data modalities. This emerging compatibility between independently trained models introduces new opportunities for cross-model alignment to downstream objectives. Moreover, this capability unlocks new potential application domains, such as settings where security, privacy, or competitiv ...
e constraints prohibit direct data or model sharing. In this work, we investigate the extent to which representational convergence enables practical linear alignment between large language models. Specifically, we learn affine transformations between the final hidden states of independent models and empirically evaluate these mappings across text generation, embedding classification, and out-of-distribution detection. We find that performance is largely preserved across model pairs, and show for the first time that linear alignment sometimes enables text generation across independently trained models. We further highlight a potential application of linear alignment for privacy-preserving cross-silo inference. The framework learns an affine transformation over a shared public dataset and uses homomorphic encryption to protect client queries. By encrypting only the linear classification operation, the method achieves sub-second inference latency.
Results & Benchmarks
Benchmark evidence drill-down
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natural language processing | Baseline | SST-2 | 92.3 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
Language models increasingly appear to learn similar representations, despite differences in training objectives, architectures, and data modalities.
Implementation Evidence Summary
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
Tasks
Natural language processing
Methods
Transformer
Domains
Natural Language Processing
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.