Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few hours
2 risk flags
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Representation learning
Claude 3 Haiku
Graph Statistical Learning
52.9
Source: paper fulltext
Representation learning
Llama 3
Graph Statistical Learning
36.5
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

2 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Representation learning Claude 3 Haiku Graph Statistical Learning 52.9 paper-derived No explicit refs
Representation learning Llama 3 Graph Statistical Learning 36.5 paper-derived No explicit refs

Can Large Language Models Analyze Graphs like Professionals? A Benchmark, Datasets and Models is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

bupt-gamma/prograph is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open bupt-gamma/prograph

Reproduction Risks

  • License metadata missing
  • No CI workflows detected
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

bupt-gamma/prograph
best maintained
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
35
Last push
Feb 20, 2025 (483d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Community adoption signal (45 stars)

Stars
45
Last push
Mar 28, 2025 (447d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (45 stars)

Stars
45
Last push
Mar 28, 2025 (447d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

bupt-gamma/prograph
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official Repository of "Can Large Language Models Analyze Graphs like Professionals? A Benchmark, Datasets and Models". NeurIPS 2024

Stars: 35
Forks: 2
Last push: Feb 20, 2025
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (35 stars)
License –
CI –
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected bupt-gamma/prograph as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 18, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · bupt-gamma/prograph has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • · Last push was 483 days ago — expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • · No Dockerfile — you will set up the environment manually.
  • · No CI pipeline — test coverage is unknown.
Open bupt-gamma/prograph

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/bupt-gamma/prograph.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Representation learning

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Natural Language Processing

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.