Bringing UFUs Back into the Air With FUEL: A Framework for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Unrestricted File Upload Vulnerability Scanners
Abstract
Domain fit: Niche / domain-specific · No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
Unrestricted file upload (UFU) is a class of web security vulnerabilities that can have a severe impact on web applications if uploaded files are not sufficiently validated or securely handled. A review of related work shows an increased interest in finding new methods to discover such vulnerabilities. However, each publication evaluates its new vulnerability scanner against a different set of artificial or real-world applications available at the time of writing. Thus, we identify the need for a comprehensive testing framework to allow a reproducible comparison between existing and future UFU vulnerability scanners. Our contributions include the File Upload Exploitation Lab (FUEL), which models 15 distinct UFU vulnerabilities in isolated scenarios to enable a reproducible evaluation of UFU scanners' capabilities. The results of evaluating four black-box UFU scanners against FUEL show that no scanner manages to identify all UFU vulnerabilities, leaving real-world websites at risk of compromise due to false negatives. Our work aims to solve this problem by extending an existing UFU scanner with multiple new detection and exploitation techniques, which we call Fuxploider-NG, to increase its accuracy from ~50% to over 90%, thereby surpassing the capabilities of existing UFU scanners and showcasing the importance of FUEL as a UFU vulnerability evaluation framework. To foster open science and future work in this area, we open-source FUEL and Fuxploider-NG.
Results and benchmarks
Unrestricted file upload (UFU) is a class of web security vulnerabilities that can have a severe impact on web applications if uploaded files are not sufficiently validated or securely handled.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPX