Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few hours
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Natural language processing
Maximum probability
Mistral 7b
0.57
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

1 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Natural language processing Maximum probability Mistral 7b 0.57 paper-derived No explicit refs

Benchmarking Uncertainty Quantification Methods for Large Language Models with LM-Polygraph is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

iinemo/lm-polygraph is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open iinemo/lm-polygraph

Reproduction Risks

  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 90/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

iinemo/lm-polygraph
best maintained
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
477
Last push
May 18, 2026 (31d ago)
CIDockerfileReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

No obvious maintenance or reproducibility risks detected.

jinhaoduan/sar
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (62 stars)

Stars
62
Last push
Sep 4, 2024 (652d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (62 stars)

Stars
62
Last push
Sep 4, 2024 (652d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

iinemo/lm-polygraph
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

IINemo/lm-polygraph

Stars: 477
Forks: 68
Last push: May 18, 2026
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Community adoption signal (477 stars)
License ✓
CI ✓
Deps ✓
Docker ✓
  • Selected iinemo/lm-polygraph as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Ready to Run
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 16, 2026

Ready to reproduce

  • · Clone iinemo/lm-polygraph and install dependencies from pyproject.toml.
  • · Dockerfile available for containerized reproduction.
  • · CI pipeline detected — automated tests are in place.
  • · Last updated 31 days ago.
Open iinemo/lm-polygraph

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/iinemo/lm-polygraph.git
pip install -e .

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Research context

Tasks

Natural language processing

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Natural Language Processing

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.