Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- Stars
- 544
- Last push
- Dec 27, 2025 (172d ago)
Risk flags
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
Xiaosong Jia, Zhenjie Yang, Qifeng Li, Zhiyuan Zhang, Junchi Yan
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
In an era marked by the rapid scaling of foundation models, autonomous driving technologies are approaching a transformative threshold where end-to-end autonomous driving (E2E-AD) emerges due to its potential of scaling up in the data-driven manner. However, existing E2E-AD methods are mostly evaluated under the open-loop log-replay manner with L2 errors and collision rate as metrics (e.g., in nuScenes), which could ...
not fully reflect the driving performance of algorithms as recently acknowledged in the community. For those E2E-AD methods evaluated under the closed-loop protocol, they are tested in fixed routes (e.g., Town05Long and Longest6 in CARLA) with the driving score as metrics, which is known for high variance due to the unsmoothed metric function and large randomness in the long route. Besides, these methods usually collect their own data for training, which makes algorithm-level fair comparison infeasible. To fulfill the paramount need of comprehensive, realistic, and fair testing environments for Full Self-Driving (FSD), we present Bench2Drive, the first benchmark for evaluating E2E-AD systems' multiple abilities in a closed-loop manner. Bench2Drive's official training data consists of 2 million fully annotated frames, collected from 13638 short clips uniformly distributed under 44 interactive scenarios (cut-in, overtaking, detour, etc), 23 weathers (sunny, foggy, rainy, etc), and 12 towns (urban, village, university, etc) in CARLA v2. Its evaluation protocol requires E2E-AD models to pass 44 interactive scenarios under different locations and weathers which sums up to 220 routes and thus provides a comprehensive and disentangled assessment about their driving capability under different situations. We implement state-of-the-art E2E-AD models and evaluate them in Bench2Drive, providing insights regarding current status and future directions.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
In an era marked by the rapid scaling of foundation models, autonomous driving technologies are approaching a transformative threshold where end-to-end autonomous driving (E2E-AD) emerges due to its potential of scaling up in the data-driven manner.
autonomousvision/carla_garage is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT). Dependency/environment manifests are present.
Open autonomousvision/carla_garageEvidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
[ICCV'23] Hidden Biases of End-to-End Driving Models & A starter kit for the CARLA leaderboard 2.0.
Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.
Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/autonomousvision/carla_garage.git
conda env create -f environment.yml && conda activate <env-name> No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
BEVFormer, UniAD, VAD in Closed-Loop CARLA Evaluation with World Model RL Expert Think2Drive
BEVFormer, UniAD, VAD in Closed-Loop CARLA Evaluation with World Model RL Expert Think2Drive
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
No trustworthy model matches right now.
Search models on Hugging FaceBroaden dataset search
Tasks
Autonomous driving
Methods
None detected
Domains
Autonomous Driving
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.