Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few days
2 risk flags
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

Beginner's Luck: A Language for Property-Based Generators is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

QuickChick/Luck is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT).

Open QuickChick/Luck

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

QuickChick/Luck
best maintained
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
37
Last push
Feb 28, 2025 (475d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
typeetfunc/anxiete
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

Stars
15
Last push
Feb 7, 2018 (3053d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

QuickChick/Luck
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Luck -- A Language for Property-Based Generators

Stars: 37
Forks: 4
Last push: Feb 28, 2025
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (37 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected QuickChick/Luck as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 17, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · QuickChick/Luck has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 475 days ago.
Open QuickChick/Luck

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Broaden dataset search

beginner luck language property dataset

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face
Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote