Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- Stars
- 18
- Last push
- Jan 5, 2023 (1260d ago)
Risk flags
- No push in 12+ months
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
Miriana Quiroga, Pablo G Garay, Juan M. Alonso, Juan Martin Loyola, Osvaldo A Martin
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) is a non-parametric method to approximate functions. It is a black-box method based on the sum of many trees where priors are used to regularize inference, mainly by restricting trees' learning capacity so that no individual tree is able to explain the data, but rather the sum of trees. We discuss BART in the context of probabilistic programming languages (PPL), i.e., we pres ...
ent BART as a primitive that can be used as a component of a probabilistic model rather than as a standalone model. Specifically, we introduce the Python library PyMC-BART, which works by extending PyMC, a library for probabilistic programming. We showcase a few examples of models that can be built using PyMC-BART, discuss recommendations for the selection of hyperparameters, and finally, we close with limitations of our implementation and future directions for improvement.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) is a non-parametric method to approximate functions.
pymc-devs/pymc-bart is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matched via arXiv identifier search). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 151 GitHub stars.
Open elanmart/rust-pgbartHardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Only a historical official implementation is available.
Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.
Hardware requirements
No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.
Matched via arXiv identifier search
BART experiments
BART experiments
No additional community repositories detected yet.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXNeed human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.