Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (90 stars)
- Stars
- 90
- Last push
- Mar 16, 2024 (728d ago)
Risk flags
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
Silei Xu, Sina J. Semnani, Giovanni Campagna, Monica S. Lam
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
We propose AutoQA, a methodology and toolkit to generate semantic parsers that answer questions on databases, with no manual effort. Given a database schema and its data, AutoQA automatically generates a large set of high-quality questions for training that covers different database operations. It uses automatic paraphrasing combined with template-based parsing to find alternative expressions of an attribute in diffe ...
rent parts of speech. It also uses a novel filtered auto-paraphraser to generate correct paraphrases of entire sentences. We apply AutoQA to the Schema2QA dataset and obtain an average logical form accuracy of 62.9% when tested on natural questions, which is only 6.4% lower than a model trained with expert natural language annotations and paraphrase data collected from crowdworkers. To demonstrate the generality of AutoQA, we also apply it to the Overnight dataset. AutoQA achieves 69.8% answer accuracy, 16.4% higher than the state-of-the-art zero-shot models and only 5.2% lower than the same model trained with human data.
Researcher verdict
This page is best used as a cautious implementation starting point. A concrete repo path exists, but benchmark grounding is still too thin to treat the page as a reliable benchmark reference.
Why this page is still worth reading
Benchmark trust
Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.
Use this page as
Use this page to start from the best available repo path, but validate benchmark claims separately before treating it as a trusted baseline.
Some benchmark signal exists in the extracted evidence, but it is not structured strongly enough yet for a confident benchmark decision.
We propose AutoQA, a methodology and toolkit to generate semantic parsers that answer questions on databases, with no manual effort.
stanford-oval/genienlp is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (NOASSERTION). Dependency/environment manifests are present.
Open stanford-oval/genienlpEvidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 90/100, grounding 85/100, status high.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (90 stars)
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Community adoption signal (204 stars)
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)
Risk flags
This page is not strong enough for a full AI-written research brief yet, so the summary is reduced to what is evidenced, what is missing, and what to do next.
What is known
What is missing
What to do next
GenieNLP: A versatile codebase for any NLP task
Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.
Follow the direct implementation path
Start with stanford-oval/genienlp and validate setup instructions in README.
Reproduce the baseline result with the provided defaults before modifying hyperparameters.
Log exact dependency versions and runtime environment for reproducibility.
Schema2QA Question Answering Dataset
No additional community repositories detected yet.
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
No trustworthy model matches right now.
Search models on Hugging FaceBroaden dataset search
No trustworthy demo spaces right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceTasks
Paraphrase and plagiarism detection
Methods
None detected
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.