Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- Stars
- 86
- Last push
- Oct 28, 2025 (222d ago)
Risk flags
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing is the primary contribution described in this paper.
lucagioacchini/auto-pen-bench is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT).
Open lucagioacchini/auto-pen-benchHardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 85/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Risk flags
This repo contains the codes of the penetration test benchmark for Generative Agents presented in the paper "AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing". It contains also the instructions to install, develop and test new vulnerable containers to include in the benchmark.
Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.
Hardware requirements
No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
No trustworthy dataset matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceEvaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXNeed human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.