Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few days
2 risk flags
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

lucagioacchini/auto-pen-bench is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (MIT).

Open lucagioacchini/auto-pen-bench

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 85/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
86
Last push
Oct 28, 2025 (222d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
16
Last push
Oct 28, 2025 (222d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
0
Last push
Feb 16, 2026 (111d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Best implementation now

lucagioacchini/auto-pen-bench
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

This repo contains the codes of the penetration test benchmark for Generative Agents presented in the paper "AutoPenBench: Benchmarking Generative Agents for Penetration Testing". It contains also the instructions to install, develop and test new vulnerable containers to include in the benchmark.

Stars: 86
Forks: 21
Last push: Oct 28, 2025
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (86 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected lucagioacchini/auto-pen-bench as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Historical official implementation

Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.

lucagioacchini/genai-pentest-paper
Stars: 16
Last push: Oct 28, 2025

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 7, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · lucagioacchini/auto-pen-bench has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 222 days ago.
Open lucagioacchini/auto-pen-bench

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Datasets

No trustworthy dataset matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.