AutoML Two-Sample Test
Abstract
Domain fit: Niche / domain-specific · No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
Two-sample tests are important in statistics and machine learning, both as tools for scientific discovery as well as to detect distribution shifts. This led to the development of many sophisticated test procedures going beyond the standard supervised learning frameworks, whose usage can require specialized knowledge about two-sample testing. We use a simple test that takes the mean discrepancy of a witness function as the test statistic and prove that minimizing a squared loss leads to a witness with optimal testing power. This allows us to leverage recent advancements in AutoML. Without any user input about the problems at hand, and using the same method for all our experiments, our AutoML two-sample test achieves competitive performance on a diverse distribution shift benchmark as well as on challenging two-sample testing problems. We provide an implementation of the AutoML two-sample test in the Python package autotst.
Results and benchmarks
Two-sample tests are important in statistics and machine learning, both as tools for scientific discovery as well as to detect distribution shifts.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from related paper: An Optimized Cost-Sensitive SVM for Imbalanced Data Learning.
- Start from this likely method family: Leverage (statistics).
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
0
Citations
0
References
Tasks
Computer science, Statistic, Sample (material), Statistical hypothesis testing, Test statistic, Python (programming language), Sample size determination, Witness
Methods
Leverage (statistics)
Domains
Machine learning, Artificial intelligence
Related papers
- An Optimized Cost-Sensitive SVM for Imbalanced Data LearningSearch on Paper2Code
2013 · Semantic similarity
- Multiple-Instance Learning with Instance Selection via Dominant SetsSearch on Paper2Code
2011 · Semantic similarity
- How to Automate Neural Net Based LearningSearch on Paper2Code
2001 · Semantic similarity
- Multiple Instance Learning for Automatic Image AnnotationSearch on Paper2Code
2013 · Semantic similarity
- Filter Approach Feature Selection Methods to Support Multi-label Learning Based on ReliefF and Information GainSearch on Paper2Code
2012 · Semantic similarity
- Combining Global and Personal Anti-Spam Filtering.Search on Paper2Code
2007 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.