Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art

Published Aug 1, 2019
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
AutoML: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Survey State-of-the-art Penn Treebank Perplexity 20 paper-derived
Survey State-of-the-art PTB Perplexity 20 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: low

Only historical official repository was found (marsggbo/automl_a_survey_of_state_of_the_art).

Open marsggbo/automl_a_survey_of_state_of_the_art
Reproduction risks
  • Only historical official implementation is available
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: marsggbo/automl_a_survey_of_state_of_the_art.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

marsggbo/automl_a_survey_of_state_of_the_art
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
14
Last push
Mar 2, 2022 (1639d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
EthicalML/chatbot
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
2
Last push
Dec 26, 2024 (608d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
danjical/OpenScience-AI
alternative
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
0
Last push
Mar 10, 2026 (169d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 26, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • marsggbo/automl_a_survey_of_state_of_the_art has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • Last push was 1639 days ago.
Open marsggbo/automl_a_survey_of_state_of_the_art

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Survey State-of-the-art

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Survey State-of-the-art

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).