Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
tf

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Learning Augmentation Policies Data
CIFAR-10
Accuracy
3.1
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

1 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Learning Augmentation Policies Data CIFAR-10 Accuracy 3.1 paper-derived No explicit refs

AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Data is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

tensorflow/models is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (NOASSERTION).

Open tensorflow/models

Reproduction Risks

  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

tensorflow/models
best maintained
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
77,664
Last push
Jun 11, 2026 (7d ago)
CIReleases

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
barisozmen/deepaugment
alternative
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Community adoption signal (250 stars)

Stars
250
Last push
Nov 14, 2025 (216d ago)
ReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match
DeepVoltaire/AutoAugment
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Strong overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (1493 stars)

Stars
1,493
Last push
May 16, 2023 (1129d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

tensorflow/models
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Models and examples built with TensorFlow

Stars: 77,664
Forks: 45,031
Last push: Jun 11, 2026
License: NOASSERTION
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Community adoption signal (77664 stars)
License ✓
CI ✓
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected tensorflow/models as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 16, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · tensorflow/models has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Open tensorflow/models

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Tasks

Learning Augmentation Policies Data

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Learning Augmentation Policies Data

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote