Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few hours
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Data Augmentation Library Document Images
Amazon
Accuracy.
60.1
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

1 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Data Augmentation Library Document Images Amazon Accuracy. 60.1 paper-derived No explicit refs

Augraphy: A Data Augmentation Library for Document Images is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

sparkfish/augraphy is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open sparkfish/augraphy

Reproduction Risks

  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 90/100, grounding 95/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 2 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

sparkfish/augraphy
best maintained
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
548
Last push
Jul 20, 2025 (335d ago)
CIDependencies

Risk flags

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
sparkfish/augraphy-paper
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
12
Last push
Aug 21, 2023 (1034d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

sparkfish/augraphy
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

Augmentation pipeline for rendering synthetic paper printing, faxing, scanning and copy machine processes

Stars: 548
Forks: 63
Last push: Jul 20, 2025
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (548 stars)
License ✓
CI ✓
Deps ✓
Docker –
  • Selected sparkfish/augraphy as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Historical official implementation

Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.

sparkfish/augraphy-paper
Stars: 12
Last push: Aug 21, 2023

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 19, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · sparkfish/augraphy has pyproject.toml but requires manual environment setup.
  • · Last push was 335 days ago — expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • · No Dockerfile — you will set up the environment manually.
Open sparkfish/augraphy

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/sparkfish/augraphy.git
pip install -e .

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Datasets

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Data Augmentation Library Document Images

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.