Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

auditor: an R Package for Model-Agnostic Visual Validation and Diagnostics

Alicja Gosiewska, Przemyslaw BiecekPublished Sep 19, 2018
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.

Machine learning models have spread to almost every area of life. They are successfully applied in biology, medicine, finance, physics, and other fields. With modern software it is easy to train even a~complex model that fits the training data and results in high accuracy on the test set. The problem arises when models fail confronted with real-world data. This paper describes methodology and tools for model-agnostic audit. Introduced techniques facilitate assessing and comparing the goodness of fit and performance of models. In~addition, they may be used for the analysis of the similarity of residuals and for identification of~outliers and influential observations. The examination is carried out by diagnostic scores and visual verification. Presented methods were implemented in the auditor package for R. Due to flexible and~consistent grammar, it is simple to validate models of any classes.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Machine learning models have spread to almost every area of life.

Implementation

Historical official implementation (not recommended for new builds)

Why this implementation
Confidence: low

ModelOriented/DrWhy is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Partial overlap with paper title keywords). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 688 GitHub stars.

Open mi2-warsaw/auditor
Reproduction risks
  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.
  • Only historical official repository was found: mi2-warsaw/auditor.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

mi2-warsaw/auditor
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
60
Last push
Jan 9, 2024 (1024d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
60
Last push
Jan 9, 2024 (1024d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
60
Last push
Jan 9, 2024 (1024d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 27, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • mi2-warsaw/auditor has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • Last push was 1024 days ago.
Open mi2-warsaw/auditor

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

Official

  • MI2DataLab/auditor
    Confidence: High

    Model verification, validation, and error analysis

    60 stars · 13 forks · Last push Jan 9, 2024

  • ModelOriented/auditor
    Confidence: High

    Model verification, validation, and error analysis

    60 stars · 13 forks · Last push Jan 9, 2024

Community

No additional community repositories detected yet.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).