Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
pytorch

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Transformer
C3D
Top-1 Accuracy
55.6
Source: paper fulltext
Transformer
3D ResNet
Top-1 Accuracy
58.0
Source: paper fulltext
Transformer
Two-Stream I3D*
Top-1 Accuracy
74.2
Source: paper fulltext
Transformer
iDT + FV
UCF101
85.9
Source: paper fulltext
Transformer
iDT + HSV
UCF101
87.9
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

5 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Transformer C3D Top-1 Accuracy 55.6 paper-derived No explicit refs
Transformer 3D ResNet Top-1 Accuracy 58.0 paper-derived No explicit refs
Transformer Two-Stream I3D* Top-1 Accuracy 74.2 paper-derived No explicit refs
Transformer iDT + FV UCF101 85.9 paper-derived No explicit refs
Transformer iDT + HSV UCF101 87.9 paper-derived No explicit refs

Attention Clusters: Purely Attention Based Local Feature Integration for Video Classification presents a transformer method.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

mindspore-ai/models is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Community adoption signal (365 stars)). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 365 GitHub stars.

Open longxiang92/Flash-MNIST

Reproduction Risks

  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 1 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

longxiang92/Flash-MNIST
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
17
Last push
Mar 14, 2018 (3020d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

longxiang92/Flash-MNIST
Historical official
Stars: 17
Last push: Mar 14, 2018
  • Only historical official repository was found: longxiang92/Flash-MNIST.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 19, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · longxiang92/Flash-MNIST has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 3020 days ago.
Open longxiang92/Flash-MNIST

Framework baselines

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

Transformer

Methods

Transformer

Domains

Computer vision

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.