Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Assessing the Impact of Speaker Identity in Speech Spoofing Detection

Anh-Tuan Dao, Driss Matrouf, Nicholas EvansPublished Feb 24, 2026
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: Niche / domain-specific · No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.

Spoofing detection systems are typically trained using diverse recordings from multiple speakers, often assuming that the resulting embeddings are independent of speaker identity. However, this assumption remains unverified. In this paper, we investigate the impact of speaker information on spoofing detection systems. We propose two approaches within our Speaker-Invariant Multi-Task framework, one that models speaker identity within the embeddings and another that removes it. SInMT integrates multi-task learning for joint speaker recognition and spoofing detection, incorporating a gradient reversal layer. Evaluated using four datasets, our speaker-invariant model reduces the average equal error rate by 17% compared to the baseline, with up to 48% reduction for the most challenging attacks (e.g., A11).

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: warm
Spoofing detection systems are typically trained using diverse recordings from multiple speakers, often assuming that the resulting embeddings are independent of speaker identity.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Detection AASIST ASV21LA 13.66 paper-derived
Detection Conformer ASV21LA 12.49 paper-derived
Detection MHFA A08 1.91 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 26, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Detection

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.