Are Non-English Papers Reviewed Fairly? Language-of-Study Bias in NLP Peer Reviews
Ehsan Barkhordar, Abdulfattah Safa, Verena Blaschke, Erika Lombart, Marie-Catherine de Marneffe +1 more
Abstract
Peer review plays a central role in the NLP publication process, but is susceptible to various biases. Here, we study language-of-study (LoS) bias: the tendency for reviewers to evaluate a paper differently based on the language(s) it studies, rather than its scientific merit. Despite being explicitly flagged in reviewing guidelines, such biases are poorly understood. Prior work treats such comments as part of broade...
Results & Benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Classification | Single-language | F1 | 0.97 |
| Classification | Multilingual-specified | F1 | 0.86 |
Hardware Requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Best Implementation
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the Implementation Status and Reproduction Path sections below for the current action plan.
Reproduction Path
Follow this baseline workflow to decide if this paper is worth immediate prototyping.
- 1
Use the paper and benchmark evidence to scope a baseline reproduction plan.
- 2
Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Additional Implementations
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
Hugging Face Artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches: