Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

Approximating Likelihood Ratios with Calibrated Discriminative Classifiers is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

madminer-tool/madminer is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matched via arXiv identifier search). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 94 GitHub stars.

Open diana-hep/carl

Reproduction Risks

  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

diana-hep/carl
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
56
Last push
May 4, 2017 (3377d ago)
Releases

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
8
Last push
Feb 19, 2025 (529d ago)
Releases Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Moderate

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Repository appears stale (>24 months since last push)

Stars
1
Last push
Dec 16, 2019 (2421d ago)
Dockerfile Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

diana-hep/carl
Historical official
Stars: 56
Last push: May 4, 2017
  • Only historical official repository was found: diana-hep/carl.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 2, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · diana-hep/carl has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 3377 days ago.
Open diana-hep/carl

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX