Analyzing Fairness in Deepfake Detection With Massively Annotated Databases
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
In recent years, image and video manipulations with Deepfake have become a severe concern for security and society. Many detection models and datasets have been proposed to detect Deepfake data reliably. However, there is an increased concern that these models and training databases might be biased and, thus, cause Deepfake detectors to fail. In this work, we investigate factors causing biased detection in public Deepfake datasets by (a) creating large-scale demographic and non-demographic attribute annotations with 47 different attributes for five popular Deepfake datasets and (b) comprehensively analysing attributes resulting in AI-bias of three state-of-the-art Deepfake detection backbone models on these datasets. The analysis shows how various attributes influence a large variety of distinctive attributes (from over 65M labels) on the detection performance which includes demographic (age, gender, ethnicity) and non-demographic (hair, skin, accessories, etc.) attributes. The results examined datasets show limited diversity and, more importantly, show that the utilised Deepfake detection backbone models are strongly affected by investigated attributes making them not fair across attributes. The Deepfake detection backbone methods trained on such imbalanced/biased datasets result in incorrect detection results leading to generalisability, fairness, and security issues. Our findings and annotated datasets will guide future research to evaluate and mitigate bias in Deepfake detection techniques. The annotated datasets and the corresponding code are publicly available.
Results and benchmarks
In recent years, image and video manipulations with Deepfake have become a severe concern for security and society.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from related paper: Improving Fairness in Deepfake Detection.
- Start from this likely method family: algorithmic fairness.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
51
Citations
50
References
Tasks
Computer science, Massively parallel, Database, deepfake detection, demographic bias, image editing, imbalanced training data, generalizability
Methods
algorithmic fairness, algorithmic bias
Domains
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Related papers
- Improving Fairness in Deepfake DetectionSearch on Paper2Code
2024 · Semantic similarity
- GBDF: Gender Balanced DeepFake Dataset Towards Fair DeepFake DetectionSearch on Paper2Code
2023 · Semantic similarity
- Fairness-Aware Deepfake Detection: Eliminating Demographic Bias Through Variance-Regularized Training and Explainable AISearch on Paper2Code
2026 · Semantic similarity
- Deepfake: Classifiers, Fairness, and Demographically Robust AlgorithmSearch on Paper2Code
2024 · Semantic similarity
- Fair-FLIP: Fair Deepfake Detection with Fairness-Oriented Final Layer Input PrioritisingSearch on Paper2Code
2025 · Semantic similarity
- Bias-Free? An Empirical Study on Ethnicity, Gender, and Age Fairness in Deepfake DetectionSearch on Paper2Code
2026 · Semantic similarity
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.