An IoT system for smart building combining multiple mmWave FMCW radars applied to people counting
Abstract
Domain fit: AI-adjacent · Paper appears method- or tooling-adjacent to AI workflows with partial ecosystem coverage.
In contemporary society, the pressing challenge of preserving user privacy clashes with the imperative for smart buildings to efficiently manage their resources, particularly in the context of occupancy monitoring for optimized energy utilization. This paper delves into the application of millimiter wave (mmWave) frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar technology for occupancy monitoring. mmWave FMCW radar, unlike conventional methods that often require the use of identifiable tags or involve image analysis, operates without the need for such identifiers, mitigating privacy concerns. However, challenges arise when attempting to cover extensive indoor spaces due to the limited range of individual mmWave FMCW radar devices. The present work proposes the use of a flexible software architecture to integrate the measurements of several mmWave FMCW radar devices, so that the whole behaves as a single sensor. To validate the proposal, an example of use in a real environment in an indoor space monitored with three mmWave FMCW radar devices is also presented. The example details the whole process, from the physical installation of the devices to the use of the different software modules that allow the integration of the data into a common internet of things (IoT) management platform such as Home Assistant. All the elements, from the measurements captured during the test to the different software implementations, are shared publicly with the scientific community.
Results and benchmarks
In contemporary society, the pressing challenge of preserving user privacy clashes with the imperative for smart buildings to efficiently manage their resources, particularly in the context of occupancy monitoring for optimized energy utilization.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Tasks
Instruction tuning
Methods
None detected
Domains
Computer vision
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.