An in-depth analysis of data reduction methods for sustainable deep learning
Javier Perera-Lago, Víctor Toscano-Durán, Eduardo Paluzo-Hidalgo, Rocı́o González-Dı́az, Miguel Á. Gutiérrez-Naranjo, Matteo Rucco
No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
<ns3:p>In recent years, Deep Learning has gained popularity for its ability to solve complex classification tasks, increasingly delivering better results thanks to the development of more accurate models, the availability of huge volumes of data and the improved computational capabilities of modern computers. However, these improvements in performance also bring efficiency problems, related to the storage of datasets ...
and models, and to the waste of energy and time involved in both the training and inference processes. In this context, data reduction can help reduce energy consumption when training a deep learning model. In this paper, we present up to eight different methods to reduce the size of a tabular training dataset, and we develop a Python package to apply them. We also introduce a representativeness metric based on topology to measure how similar are the reduced datasets and the full training dataset. Additionally, we develop a methodology to apply these data reduction methods to image datasets for object detection tasks. Finally, we experimentally compare how these data reduction methods affect the representativeness of the reduced dataset, the energy consumption and the predictive performance of the model.</ns3:p>
Results & Benchmarks
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
<ns3:p>In recent years, Deep Learning has gained popularity for its ability to solve complex classification tasks, increasingly delivering better results thanks to the development of more accurate models, the availability of huge volumes of data and the improved computational capabilities of modern computers.
Implementation Evidence Summary
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Reproduction Risks
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence disclosure
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation Status
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Start from related paper: Overview of deep learning in medical imaging.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Reproduction readiness
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
No verified implementation available
- · No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
Framework baselines
- TorchVision object detection finetuning tutorial
Baseline setup for object detection workflows.
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Datasets
Spaces
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Research context
6
Citations
74
References
Tasks
Deep learning, Computer science, Environmental science, Physical Sciences
Methods
None detected
Domains
Reduction (mathematics), Artificial intelligence
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Related papers
-
Search on Paper2Code
Overview of deep learning in medical imaging (2017) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Survey of Machine Learning Applications of Convolutional Neural Networks to Medical Image Analysis (2021) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Exploring Deep Learning for View-Based 3D Model Retrieval (2020) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Deep learning ensemble 2D CNN approach towards the detection of lung cancer (2023) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
A Comprehensive Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques in Biomedical Image Processing Using Convolutional Neural Network (2022) Semantic similarity
-
Search on Paper2Code
Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning in Nuclear Medicine (2022) Semantic similarity
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.