Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

An Empirical Study on Cross-X Transfer for Legal Judgment Prediction

Published Sep 1, 2022
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
An Empirical Study on Cross-X Transfer for Legal Judgment Prediction is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited
joelniklaus/swissjudgementprediction

This repository provides code for experiments with the state-of-the-art in text classification to predict the judgements of Swiss court decisions

27 stars · 8 forks · Last push Sep 23, 2025

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Community adoption signal (27 stars)

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

joelniklaus/swissjudgementprediction is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open joelniklaus/swissjudgementprediction
Reproduction risks
  • License metadata missing
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Selected joelniklaus/swissjudgementprediction as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Kaleidophon/deep-significance
historical official
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
341
Last push
Jul 1, 2024 (786d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
joelniklaus/swissjudgementprediction
best maintained
Maintenance
Stale risk
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
27
Last push
Sep 23, 2025 (337d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
JoelNiklaus/SwissJudgementPrediction
alternative
Maintenance
Stale risk
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
27
Last push
Sep 23, 2025 (337d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (27 stars)

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • joelniklaus/swissjudgementprediction has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • Last push was 337 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open joelniklaus/swissjudgementprediction

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/joelniklaus/swissjudgementprediction.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy models matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Curated Related

Broaden dataset search

empirical cross transfer legal dataset

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).