An automated machine learning framework to optimize radiomics model construction validated on twelve clinical applications
Results and benchmarks
An automated machine learning framework to optimize radiomics model construction validated on twelve clinical applications is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.
Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.
Implementation
Best maintained implementation now
Workflow for Optimal Radiomics Classification
87 stars · 21 forks · Last push Feb 13, 2026 · NOASSERTION license
- License
- CI
- Dependencies
- Docker
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Matched via arXiv identifier search
MStarmans91/WORC is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (NOASSERTION).
Open MStarmans91/WORC- No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
- Selected MStarmans91/WORC as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
- Includes CI workflow signals.
- Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
- Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Stale risk
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Strong
- Stars
- 87
- Last push
- Feb 13, 2026 (193d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Stale risk
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 7
- Last push
- Feb 13, 2026 (193d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No CI pipeline detected
- No Docker setup
- Dependency manifest missing
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 6
- Last push
- Sep 15, 2024 (709d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
Reproduction readiness
Setup required
Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed
- MStarmans91/WORC has pyproject.toml but requires manual environment setup.
- Last push was 193 days ago, so expect possible dependency version conflicts.
- No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/MStarmans91/WORC.git
pip install -e .Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
Official
No additional official repositories detected.
Community
- MStarmans91/WORCDatabaseConfidence: Medium
Code to reproduce the experiments as described in the paper "Reproducible radiomics through automated machine learning validated on twelve clinical applications", Starmans et al. 2021, In Preparation
7 stars · 2 forks · Last push Feb 13, 2026 · Apache-2.0 license
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- aydindemircioglu/radMLBench
Confidence: Low · 6 stars
- Douwe-Spaanderman/DMRadiomics
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Models
No trustworthy models matches right now.
Search models on Hugging FaceDatasets
- mlnomad/imnet1k_cash_machine_cash_dispenser_automated_teller_machine_automatic_teller_machine_au
11 downloads · 0 likes · Updated Jul 3, 2025
Broaden dataset search
Spaces
No trustworthy spaces matches right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceResearch context
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXData includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).