Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few hours
tf

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

Adversarial Robustness Toolbox v1.0.0 is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

IBM/adversarial-robustness-toolbox is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open IBM/adversarial-robustness-toolbox

Reproduction Risks

  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.

Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 85/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

IBM/adversarial-robustness-toolbox
best maintained
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
6,028
Last push
Dec 12, 2025 (180d ago)
CIDockerfileReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

No obvious maintenance or reproducibility risks detected.

IBM/AIF360
alternative
Maintenance: Active
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Strong

Community adoption signal (2821 stars)

Stars
2,821
Last push
Jun 8, 2026 (1d ago)
CIReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

  • No Docker setup
  • Low confidence match
Abhishek2271/AdversarialNeuralNetworkToolkit
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
1
Last push
Oct 14, 2024 (603d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Best implementation now

IBM/adversarial-robustness-toolbox
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (ART) - Python Library for Machine Learning Security - Evasion, Poisoning, Extraction, Inference - Red and Blue Teams

Stars: 6,028
Forks: 1,318
Last push: Dec 12, 2025
License: MIT
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (6028 stars)
License ✓
CI ✓
Deps ✓
Docker ✓
  • Selected IBM/adversarial-robustness-toolbox as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Reproduction readiness

Ready to Run
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 9, 2026

Ready to reproduce

  • · Clone IBM/adversarial-robustness-toolbox and install dependencies from pyproject.toml.
  • · Dockerfile available for containerized reproduction.
  • · CI pipeline detected — automated tests are in place.
  • · Last updated 180 days ago.
Open IBM/adversarial-robustness-toolbox

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/IBM/adversarial-robustness-toolbox.git
pip install -e .

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Broaden model search

adversarial robustness toolbox

Datasets

No trustworthy dataset matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy demo spaces right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face
Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote