Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- Stars
- 105
- Last push
- Mar 12, 2025 (463d ago)
Risk flags
- No push in 12+ months
- No tagged releases
Quentin Delfosse, Patrick Schramowski, Martin Mundt, Alejandro Molina, Kristian Kersting
Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.
Latest insights from biology show that intelligence not only emerges from the connections between neurons but that individual neurons shoulder more computational responsibility than previously anticipated. This perspective should be critical in the context of constantly changing distinct reinforcement learning environments, yet current approaches still primarily employ static activation functions. In this work, we mo ...
tivate why rationals are suitable for adaptable activation functions and why their inclusion into neural networks is crucial. Inspired by recurrence in residual networks, we derive a condition under which rational units are closed under residual connections and formulate a naturally regularised version: the recurrent-rational. We demonstrate that equipping popular algorithms with (recurrent-)rational activations leads to consistent improvements on Atari games, especially turning simple DQN into a solid approach, competitive to DDQN and Rainbow.
No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.
Latest insights from biology show that intelligence not only emerges from the connections between neurons but that individual neurons shoulder more computational responsibility than previously anticipated.
ml-research/rational_activations is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).
Open ml-research/rational_activationsLLM evidence refs: paper.title, summary.hasReliableImplementation
Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.
Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 85/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Risk flags
Rational Activation Functions - Replacing Padé Activation Units
Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.
Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed
Quick start
git clone https://github.com/ml-research/rational_activations.git
pip install -r requirements.txt No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.
Activation functions in pytorch
Rational Networks in Supervized Learning such as MNIST, CIFAR and Imagenet Classification
No additional community repositories detected yet.
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Broaden model search
No trustworthy dataset matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceNo trustworthy demo spaces right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceTasks
None detected
Methods
Reinforcement learning
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.