Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

Adaptive numerical simulations with Trixi.jl: A case study of Julia for scientific computing

Published Aug 1, 2021
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Adaptive numerical simulations with Trixi.jl: A case study of Julia for scientific computing focuses on scientific computing.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Trixi.jl: Adaptive high-order numerical simulations of conservation laws in Julia

725 stars · 165 forks · Last push Aug 20, 2026 · MIT license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Matched via arXiv identifier search

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

trixi-framework/Trixi.jl is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).

Open trixi-framework/Trixi.jl
Reproduction risks
  • Dependency manifest is missing
  • Selected trixi-framework/Trixi.jl as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance
Active
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
725
Last push
Aug 20, 2026 (5d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
6
Last push
Jan 15, 2022 (1683d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
4
Last push
Aug 20, 2026 (5d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords

  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
  • Low confidence match

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 20, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • trixi-framework/Trixi.jl has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Open trixi-framework/Trixi.jl

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

Curated Related

Datasets

No trustworthy datasets matches right now.

Search datasets on Hugging Face

Spaces

No trustworthy spaces matches right now.

Search spaces on Hugging Face

Research context

Tasks

Scientific computing

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).