Adaptive numerical simulations with Trixi.jl: A case study of Julia for scientific computing
Results and benchmarks
Adaptive numerical simulations with Trixi.jl: A case study of Julia for scientific computing focuses on scientific computing.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 4 refs, 4 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 85/100, status medium.
Implementation
Best maintained implementation now
Trixi.jl: Adaptive high-order numerical simulations of conservation laws in Julia
725 stars · 165 forks · Last push Aug 20, 2026 · MIT license
- License
- CI
- Dependencies
- Docker
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Matched via arXiv identifier search
trixi-framework/Trixi.jl is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (MIT).
Open trixi-framework/Trixi.jl- Dependency manifest is missing
- Selected trixi-framework/Trixi.jl as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
- Includes CI workflow signals.
- Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
- Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Active
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 725
- Last push
- Aug 20, 2026 (5d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No Docker setup
- Dependency manifest missing
- Maintenance
- Stale
- Confidence
- High
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 6
- Last push
- Jan 15, 2022 (1683d)
Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
- No push in 12+ months
- No CI pipeline detected
- No Docker setup
- Maintenance
- Active
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 4
- Last push
- Aug 20, 2026 (5d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords
- No Docker setup
- Dependency manifest missing
- Low confidence match
Reproduction readiness
Major work
No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required
- trixi-framework/Trixi.jl has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
- You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- ACoM-RWTH/AeroTrixi.jl
Confidence: Low · 4 stars
- jackhfarrell/FermiSea.jl
Confidence: Low · 1 stars
- FelixRaup/Trixi.jl
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.
Datasets
No trustworthy datasets matches right now.
Search datasets on Hugging FaceSpaces
No trustworthy spaces matches right now.
Search spaces on Hugging FaceResearch context
Tasks
Scientific computing
Methods
None detected
Domains
None detected
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXJump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).