Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

A Survey on Small Language Models in the Era of Large Language Models: Architecture, Capabilities, and Trustworthiness

Fali Wang, Minhua Lin, Yao Ma, Hui Liu, Qi He +4 morePublished Aug 3, 2025
DOI Publisher
Researcher verdict
Context only
Use as context only
Benchmark evidence
Missing
Not verified yet
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
2
Review before use

Abstract

Domain fit: AI-core · Core AI workload signals detected from paper context and implementation/artifact evidence.

Large language models (LLMs) based on Transformer architecture are powerful but face challenges with deployment, inference latency, and costly fine-tuning. These limitations highlight the emerging potential of small language models (SLMs), which can either replace LLMs through innovative architectures and technologies, or assist them as efficient proxy or reward models. Emerging architectures such as Mamba and xLSTM address the quadratic scaling of inference with window length in Transformers by enabling linear scaling. To maximize SLM performance, test-time compute scaling strategies reduce the performance gap with LLMs by allocating extra compute budget during test time. Beyond standalone usage, SLMs could also assist in LLMs via weak-to-strong learning, proxy tuning, and guarding, fostering secure and efficient LLM deployment. Lastly, the trustworthiness of SLMs remains a critical yet underexplored research area. However, there is a lack of tutorials on cutting-edge SLM technologies, prompting us to conduct one.

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Large language models (LLMs) based on Transformer architecture are powerful but face challenges with deployment, inference latency, and costly fine-tuning.

Implementation

No direct implementation yet

Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.

Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.

Implementation evidence summary
Confidence: low

Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.

Reproduction risks
  • Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Oct 26, 2026

No repo

No verified implementation available

  • No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Framework baselines

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

13

Citations

37

References

Tasks

Computer science, Trustworthiness, Programming language, Data science, Mamba, xLSTM, test-time compute scaling, guarding

Methods

Architecture, Computer architecture, small language models, large language models, proxy models, reward models

Domains

Natural language processing, Artificial intelligence

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.