Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few days
2 risk flags
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

A Subterranean Virtual Cave World for Gazebo based on the DARPA SubT Challenge is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: medium

LTU-RAI/darpa_subt_worlds is the best available implementation candidate based on ranking signals, but recommendation confidence is not yet high. License is declared (MIT).

Open LTU-RAI/darpa_subt_worlds

Reproduction Risks

  • No CI workflows detected
  • Dependency manifest is missing

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 65/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

LTU-CEG/gazebo_cave_world
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
76
Last push
Apr 25, 2020 (2247d ago)
Releases

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup
LTU-RAI/darpa_subt_worlds
best maintained
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
32
Last push
Apr 18, 2025 (428d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
ltu-rai/gazebo_cave_world
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Partial overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (76 stars)

Stars
76
Last push
Apr 25, 2020 (2247d ago)
Releases

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup

Best implementation now

LTU-RAI/darpa_subt_worlds
Confidence: Medium
Reproducibility: Limited

Virtual worlds from the DARPA subterranean challenge

Stars: 32
Forks: 6
Last push: Apr 18, 2025
License: MIT
Matched via arXiv identifier search
Strong overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (32 stars)
License ✓
CI –
Deps –
Docker –
  • Selected LTU-RAI/darpa_subt_worlds as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Historical official implementation

Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.

LTU-CEG/gazebo_cave_world
Stars: 76
Last push: Apr 25, 2020

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 19, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · LTU-RAI/darpa_subt_worlds has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 428 days ago.
Open LTU-RAI/darpa_subt_worlds

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote