Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

A Simple Fix to Mahalanobis Distance for Improving Near-OOD Detection

Published Jun 1, 2021
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few days
Plan setup time
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
A Simple Fix to Mahalanobis Distance for Improving Near-OOD Detection is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Improving Near-ood Detection CIFAR-100 Accuracy 89.91 paper-derived
Improving Near-ood Detection CIFAR-10 Accuracy 97.66 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate
google/uncertainty-baselines

High-quality implementations of standard and SOTA methods on a variety of tasks.

1,589 stars · 223 forks · Last push Aug 9, 2026 · Apache-2.0 license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Community adoption signal (1589 stars)

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

google/uncertainty-baselines is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (Apache-2.0).

Open google/uncertainty-baselines
Reproduction risks
  • Dependency manifest is missing
  • Selected google/uncertainty-baselines as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

google/uncertainty-baselines
best maintained
Maintenance
Active
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
1,589
Last push
Aug 9, 2026 (16d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
  • Dependency manifest missing
stanislavfort/exploring_the_limits_of_OOD_detection
alternative
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
44
Last push
Jan 14, 2022 (1684d)

Partial overlap with paper title keywords · Community adoption signal (44 stars)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Aug 24, 2026

Major work

No dependency manifest, manual reconstruction required

  • google/uncertainty-baselines has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
Open google/uncertainty-baselines

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Research context

Tasks

Improving Near-ood Detection

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Improving Near-ood Detection

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).