A determinant of Stirling cycle numbers counts unlabeled acyclic single-source automata
Abstract
Domain fit: Niche / domain-specific · No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
We show that a determinant of Stirling cycle numbers counts unlabeled acyclic single-source automata. The proof involves a bijection from these automata to certain marked lattice paths and a sign-reversing involution to evaluate the determinant.
Results and benchmarks
We show that a determinant of Stirling cycle numbers counts unlabeled acyclic single-source automata.
Benchmark evidence is limited
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 60/100, grounding 58/100, status medium.
Implementation
No direct implementation yet
Maintained implementation evidence is not confirmed for this paper yet.
Use the implementation status and reproduction sections for the current action plan.
No verified maintained repo yet
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
- No direct maintained implementation was found. Use the paper PDF and citation graph to design a baseline reproduction.
- Track assumptions and missing details in an experiment log before coding.
Time to first repro: a few days
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
- Estimate is based on paper-only reproduction flow
Compare implementation paths
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
- Maintenance
- Stale risk
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 54
- Last push
- Dec 12, 2025 (322d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (54 stars)
- No CI pipeline detected
- No Docker setup
- Dependency manifest missing
- Maintenance
- Stale risk
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Moderate
- Stars
- 0
- Last push
- Nov 13, 2025 (350d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Dependency manifest missing
- Maintenance
- Recently updated
- Confidence
- Low
- Reproducibility
- Limited
- Stars
- 0
- Last push
- Aug 5, 2026 (86d)
Matched via arXiv identifier search
- No CI pipeline detected
- No tagged releases
- Low confidence match
Reproduction readiness
No repo
No verified implementation available
- No maintained repository has been identified for this paper. Check adjacent implementations or HF artifacts below.
Hardware requirements
- Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Validation caveat
Repositories and ecosystem
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
- miku/xmlcutty
Confidence: Low · 54 stars
- thorwhalen/xv
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
- 72-yh/paper-recommender
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
- LettaSav/Savchenko_nosql_2
Confidence: Low · 0 stars
Hugging Face artifacts
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet. Use targeted searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tip: start with models, then check datasets and spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Research context
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXData includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).