Skip to content
OpenTrain AIFor AI Companies

A Comprehensive Survey on Multimodal Recommender Systems: Taxonomy, Evaluation, and Future Directions

Published Feb 1, 2023
arXiv PDF
Researcher verdict
Starting point
Use as implementation starting point
Benchmark evidence
Thin evidence
Verify before relying
Time to first repro
A few hours
Fast first run
Risk flags
1
Review before use

Results and benchmarks

Freshness tier: hot
A Comprehensive Survey on Multimodal Recommender Systems: Taxonomy, Evaluation, and Future Directions is the primary contribution described in this paper.
Task Dataset Metric Value Source
Taxonomy Evaluation Future Directions Baby Recall@50 0.1054 paper-derived
Taxonomy Evaluation Future Directions LightGCN Recall@10 0.0754 paper-derived
Taxonomy Evaluation Future Directions BPR Sports, NDCG@20. 9 paper-derived
Taxonomy Evaluation Future Directions MMGCN Sports, NDCG@20. 10 paper-derived

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure below.

Implementation

Best maintained implementation now

Recommended
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

A Toolbox for MultiModal Recommendation. Integrating 10+ Models...

685 stars · 106 forks · Last push Jul 14, 2026 · GPL-3.0 license

  • License
  • CI
  • Dependencies
  • Docker

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata · Community adoption signal (685 stars)

Why this implementation
Confidence: high

enoche/mmrec is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. License is declared (GPL-3.0). Dependency/environment manifests are present.

Open enoche/mmrec
Reproduction risks
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Selected enoche/mmrec as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.
  • Official repository is preserved separately as historical context.

Compare implementation paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

enoche/mmrec
best maintained
Maintenance
Recently updated
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Moderate
Stars
685
Last push
Jul 14, 2026 (44d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
High
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
26
Last push
Feb 2, 2024 (937d)

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance
Stale
Confidence
Low
Reproducibility
Limited
Stars
26
Last push
Feb 2, 2024 (937d)

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (26 stars)

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases

Reproduction readiness

Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Aug 22, 2026

Setup required

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • enoche/mmrec has requirements.txt but requires manual environment setup.
  • No Dockerfile, so you will set up the environment manually.
  • No CI pipeline, so test coverage is unknown.
Open enoche/mmrec

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/enoche/mmrec.git
pip install -r requirements.txt

Repositories and ecosystem

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Research context

Tasks

Taxonomy Evaluation Future Directions

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation and human feedback data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX
Explore similar papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Data includes links from Papers with Code ( CC-BY-SA-4.0 ).