Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (511 stars)
- Stars
- 511
- Last push
- May 15, 2026 (16d ago)
Risk flags
- No tagged releases
- No Docker setup
- Low confidence match
Thibault Bañeras-Roux, Mickael Rouvier, Jane Wottawa, Richard Dufour
No strong AI-core implementation/artifact signals were detected from current providers.
The performance of end-to-end automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems enables their increasing integration into numerous applications. While there are various benefits to such speech-to-text systems, the choice of hyperparameters and models plays a crucial role in their performance. Typically, these choices are determined by considering only the character (CER) and/or word error rate (WER) metrics. However, it has ...
been shown in several studies that these metrics are largely incomplete and fail to adequately describe the downstream application of automatic transcripts. In this paper, we conduct a qualitative study on the French language that investigates the impact of subword tokenization algorithms and self-supervised learning models from different linguistic and acoustic perspectives, using a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics.
Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Source | Evidence refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Speech | w2v2-FR-1K | UWER | 77.42 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Speech | w2v2-FR-3K | UWER | 76.84 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
| Speech | w2v2-FR-7k | UWER | 75.19 | paper-derived | No explicit refs |
The performance of end-to-end automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems enables their increasing integration into numerous applications.
Recommendation evidence is currently too limited for a maintained-repo choice. Use Implementation Status and Reproduction Path for a practical baseline plan.
Hardware Notes
Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.
Evidence graph: 2 refs, 1 links.
Utility signals: depth 95/100, grounding 68/100, status medium.
Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (511 stars)
Risk flags
Matched via arXiv identifier search · Partial overlap with paper title keywords
Risk flags
There is no verified maintained implementation yet. Use this baseline plan to decide whether to prototype now or defer.
Hardware requirements
No verified implementation available
No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.
These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.
No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.
Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:
Datasets
Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.
Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.
Tasks
Speech
Methods
None detected
Domains
None detected
Evaluation & Human Feedback Data
Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.
Open in HFEPXExplore Similar Papers
Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.
Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.