Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: missing
Time to repro: a few hours
tf

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence

No concrete benchmark grounding is available yet. Treat the page as context or an implementation starting point only.

A Comparison of Deep Learning Architectures for Optical Galaxy Morphology Classification is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: high

mwalmsley/zoobot is the strongest maintained implementation based on ranking signals. CI workflows are present. License is declared (GPL-3.0).

Open mwalmsley/zoobot

Reproduction Risks

  • No repository-level red flags were detected, but paper-specific preprocessing and hyperparameter details may still be under-specified.
Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 55/100, grounding 75/100, status medium.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

mwalmsley/zoobot
best maintained
Maintenance: Stale risk
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
125
Last push
Oct 26, 2025 (237d ago)
CIDockerfileReleasesDependencies

Risk flags

No obvious maintenance or reproducibility risks detected.

ezrafielding/zoobot-arch-comp
historical official
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Moderate

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Strong overlap with paper title keywords

Stars
1
Last push
Sep 9, 2024 (649d ago)
Dependencies

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
georgestein/ml-in-cosmology
alternative
Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search · Community adoption signal (434 stars)

Stars
434
Last push
Apr 27, 2023 (1150d ago)
Releases

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No Docker setup

Best implementation now

mwalmsley/zoobot
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Strong

Classifies galaxy morphology with Bayesian CNN

Stars: 125
Forks: 32
Last push: Oct 26, 2025
License: GPL-3.0
Official implementation from Papers with Code
Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata
Partial overlap with paper title keywords
Community adoption signal (125 stars)
License ✓
CI ✓
Deps ✓
Docker ✓
  • Selected mwalmsley/zoobot as the strongest maintained implementation for new work.
  • Includes CI workflow signals.
  • Includes dependency/environment manifest signals.
  • Repository activity is within the last 24 months.

Historical official implementation

Preserved for provenance. Not recommended as the default path for new builds.

ezrafielding/zoobot-arch-comp
Stars: 1
Last push: Sep 9, 2024

Reproduction readiness

Setup Required
Time to first repro: hours
Last checked: Jun 18, 2026

Dependencies pinned, manual setup needed

  • · mwalmsley/zoobot has pyproject.toml but requires manual environment setup.
  • · Last push was 237 days ago — expect possible dependency version conflicts.
Open mwalmsley/zoobot

Quick start

git clone https://github.com/mwalmsley/zoobot.git
pip install -e .

No benchmark numbers could be verified. You will not be able to validate reproduction correctness against published numbers.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No direct paper-linked artifacts were found. Showing strongest curated related artifacts for faster exploration.

Models

No trustworthy model matches right now.

Search models on Hugging Face

Datasets

Broaden dataset search

comparison deep learning architectures dataset

Spaces

Broaden demo search

comparison deep learning architectures demo
Search models Search datasets Search spaces

Research context

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.

Post a Job Get a Quote