Skip to content
implementation starting point
Benchmarks: thin evidence
Time to repro: a few days
1 risk flag
none

Results & Benchmarks

Freshness tier: cold
Direct + Inferred Evidence
Collaborative Research Into Multi-objective Autotuning Machine
ft65
Accuracy
0.36
Source: paper fulltext

Benchmark evidence drill-down

1 findings

Audit each benchmark finding before selecting an implementation path. Evidence refs map to the disclosure section below.

Task Dataset Metric Value Source Evidence refs
Collaborative Research Into Multi-objective Autotuning Machine ft65 Accuracy 0.36 paper-derived No explicit refs

A Collective Knowledge workflow for collaborative research into multi-objective autotuning and machine learning techniques is the primary contribution described in this paper.

Use This Implementation Because…

Confidence: low

ctuning/reproduce-milepost-project is the closest maintained adjacent implementation (Matched via arXiv identifier search). It is not paper-verified; validate algorithm and evaluation setup against the paper before trusting reported metrics. Community adoption signal: 49 GitHub stars.

Open ctuning/ck-rpi-optimization-results

Reproduction Risks

  • Adjacent implementations are not paper-verified
  • Recommended repository is adjacent and not paper-verified.
  • Adjacent implementation match confidence is low.
  • No direct maintained implementation is currently verified.

Hardware Notes

Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

Evidence disclosure

Evidence graph: 3 refs, 3 links.

Utility signals: depth 100/100, grounding 85/100, status high.

Implementation Comparison

Top 3 paths

Compare maintenance quality, reproducibility coverage, and evidence confidence before choosing a reproduction baseline.

Maintenance: Stale
Confidence: High
Reproducibility: Limited

Official implementation from Papers with Code · Repository link is mentioned in the paper metadata

Stars
20
Last push
Feb 6, 2021 (1960d ago)

Risk flags

  • No push in 12+ months
  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
0
Last push
Jan 15, 2026 (156d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup
honeyvig/ck-tvm
alternative
Maintenance: Recently updated
Confidence: Low
Reproducibility: Limited

Matched via arXiv identifier search

Stars
0
Last push
Jan 15, 2026 (156d ago)

Risk flags

  • No CI pipeline detected
  • No tagged releases
  • No Docker setup

Best implementation now

Only a historical official implementation is available.

Use with caution for new projects; verify against current tooling and maintained community alternatives.

ctuning/ck-rpi-optimization-results
Historical official
Stars: 20
Last push: Feb 6, 2021
  • Only historical official repository was found: ctuning/ck-rpi-optimization-results.
  • No maintained paper-verified implementation met reliability thresholds.

Reproduction readiness

Major Work
Time to first repro: days
Last checked: Jun 19, 2026

Hardware requirements

  • Expect multi-day setup/compute for meaningful reproduction based on current guidance.

No dependency manifest — manual reconstruction required

  • · ctuning/ck-rpi-optimization-results has no requirements.txt, environment.yml, pyproject.toml, or Dockerfile.
  • · You will need to reverse-engineer dependencies from import statements in the source code.
  • · Last push was 1960 days ago.
Open ctuning/ck-rpi-optimization-results

Closest related implementations

These are not paper-verified. Use them as reference points when no direct implementation is available.

Additional implementations

No additional verified repositories beyond the primary recommendation.

These repositories had low-confidence matching signals and are hidden by default.

Hugging Face artifacts

No trustworthy direct or curated related Hugging Face artifacts were found yet.

Continue with targeted Hugging Face searches derived from the paper title and method context:

Tip: start with models, then check datasets/spaces if you need evaluation data or demos.

Direct artifact matches are currently sparse. Use targeted Hugging Face searches to quickly locate candidate models, datasets, and demos.

Research context

Tasks

Collaborative Research Into Multi-objective Autotuning Machine

Methods

None detected

Domains

None detected

Evaluation & Human Feedback Data

Open this paper in HFEPX to review benchmark signals, evaluation modes, and human-feedback protocol context.

Open in HFEPX

Explore Similar Papers

Jump to Paper2Code search queries derived from this paper's research context.

Need human evaluators for your AI research? Scale annotation with expert AI Trainers.